For some reason, I never much liked the sentence “I
am a ___,” no matter which word or phrase completed it (I’m sure people that know me have a few choice – mainly profane – options to hand,
but I’m talking about careers or other forms of identity). It always seemed so
fixed, so final, so definitive, and I had always liked eluding definition. Whatever people say I am, that’s what I’m not,
as Arctic Monkeys put it.
The other day, while trudging through a conversation’s introductory small-talk, someone I’d known for two gulps of lager asked me what I did (I presume he meant for a job). “I’m a cricket writer,” I said, without much thought. No sooner had it left my mouth, however, than I wanted to qualify it, de-glamourise it, be accurate – “It’s not regular work and I’m barely making ends meet”; “I’m freelancing at a time when journalism as a whole is struggling to pay the bills, what with all the free content on the web”; “I’m a chancer, a bum”; “I’m constantly having to think of ideas, pitching them to stressed editors, badgering stressed editors, annoying stressed editors, looking for other editors”. It feels like hard work, alright, but not like a job.
The other day, while trudging through a conversation’s introductory small-talk, someone I’d known for two gulps of lager asked me what I did (I presume he meant for a job). “I’m a cricket writer,” I said, without much thought. No sooner had it left my mouth, however, than I wanted to qualify it, de-glamourise it, be accurate – “It’s not regular work and I’m barely making ends meet”; “I’m freelancing at a time when journalism as a whole is struggling to pay the bills, what with all the free content on the web”; “I’m a chancer, a bum”; “I’m constantly having to think of ideas, pitching them to stressed editors, badgering stressed editors, annoying stressed editors, looking for other editors”. It feels like hard work, alright, but not like a job.
Old friends at Moddershall may also say that if
there was one thing I was expert at, it was avoiding work. At times, I’ve
followed that famous maxim of Mark Twain: why put off till tomorrow what you
can do the day after that. But it’s not true that I’m work-shy; I’m merely trying
to avoid work that I dislike doing – which, given that I dislike most of it, is
proving quite difficult. A real effort, in fact; pretty much a job.
Anyway, in January 2011, having finally submitted my PhD thesis (ten
years, much extenuation) and while waiting for the viva voce exam (a two-hour interview with internal and external
examiners, the latter an expert, to ensure you haven’t copy-pasted it off
t’internet), I got involved as sports editor with a Nottingham magazine, Leftlion,
my sole purpose being to wile away some time watching Notts from the comfort of
the press box before the July Judgement Day arrived (it arrived the following
January after Professor Beasley-Murray, University of Vancouver, also decided
he didn’t like work, and went AWOL). That and the odd free lunch.
That summer, I watched two
days of the season opener against Hampshire and perhaps spent another dozen
days down there, the highlight being seeing Trescothick make an imperious
80-odd in the same game that Kieswetter and Hales both made big, though less
impressive, hundreds. While the standard was high, it was, apart from the T20
games, all snoozily low-key. Blasting Dizzee Rascal’s ‘Bonkers’ over the PA
system (mandatory at T20) at a ‘Champo’ game might truthfully describe the few
hundred sloppily shaven, biscuit crumb-covered men dotted about the ground,
just out of range for small-talk with any
other living soul whatsoever, but would, on balance, probably have been a tad incongruous.
view from Trent Bridge press box |
In any case, I grasped that this county reporting malarkey
was a perfectly pleasant way to make a living (several hacks think Trent Bridge’s
press box the best in the country, due to its perfect viewing angle and, crucially,
having the canteen right behind it), even if it lacked real big-stage excitement.
Last year, however, I got to feel what cricket writing could really be like as I covered the England versus West Indies Test down by the Trent for Spin magazine.
After two days of sedate pre-game press conferences
with coaches, skippers and the Duracell enthusiasm of Sky Sports’ Tim Abrahams,
the game, at last, arrived. I awoke as excited as if playing a
title-decider or cup final. Nottingham basked beneath some late-May sun – it
had rained for a week either side of this six-day period – and I, King
Slugabed, eagerly caught tram and bus across the city, walked over the bridge
through the buzz and swell of slowly lubricating supporters (even before 10am),
had my ECB accreditation swiped, then went up to find my seat, fire up the
laptop and, well, get some complementary food. Nom, nom.
The chalk-and-cheese difference in the bleachers
from County Championship to Test was replicated
within the press’s inner sanctum: where a county game might have ten there (couple of the
broadsheets, local press, cricinfo, press officers for the two teams, OPTA), here around 70
of the 92 seats were taken. There were the Oxbridge-educated ex-internationals:
Mike Atherton and Ed Smith (Times), Derek Pringle and Steve James (Telegraph),
Mike Selvey and Vic Marks (Guardian); there were the correspondents, Peter
Hayter, Stephen Brenkley, Paul Newman, the red-toppers John Etheridge and Dean Wilson;
a couple of Caribbean scribes; reporters from press agencies (AP, AFP, Reuters)
and websites and the other magazines; owlish Wisden editor Lawrence Booth; ECB
employees; sponsors reps; plastic zebras; a scorer with a microphone, helpfully
dispensing statistics. TVs were on and a masseuse right behind me soothed the probably-already-quite-relaxed
muscles of MCJ Nicholas as he whispered his probably-minor stresses to her.
Notts had provided stewards to ensure there was no
movement within (or traffic in and out of) the press box when the bowler was
operating from our end, Radcliffe
Road (which was, y’know, roughly half the time…). The lugubrious Pringle, keen to avail his
massive heft of the masseuse’s kneading skills, tried to beetle along the row
between deliveries, only to be admonished by some sergeant-majorly volunteer
who set about explaining why the hacks couldn’t move. “Yes, thanks, I get it,”
Pringle fired back, tersely. “I did play the odd game, you know. Here and
there.”
Pringle bowls at someone... |
Nasser Hussain would bob in between commentary
stints, open his laptop, keeping himself to himself; Bumble occasionally
shuffled in to sit next to his ghost writer, feeding him opinions and generally
grinning (apropos of drawing breath); Mikey Holding dropped in now and then, soft-shoed and cool;
Beefy remained up above somewhere. The canteen was full of people I had spent idle
days watching when I ought to have been researching Peronist Argentina: Mark
Butcher, relaxed as a pussycat, playing finger drums on the table; Alec Stewart
carefully unfolding his napkin, neat and tidily in character; Michael Vaughan, asking
if he could borrow the salt and pepper. Aggers, Tuffers, Wardy, Simon Hughes
buzzed through.
It was, I guess, an intimidating experience. Your
eyes cast around for friendly faces, looking – hoping – for small-talk. I had an
ice-breaking device (no, not an ice-pick) or two, however, inasmuch as I’d been
collating questionnaires from cricket writers, which gave me an excuse to
approach the seemingly more approachable characters. Amiable men I’d seen on
the county beat – Andy Wilson and George Dobell – struck up conversation over
lunch. I soon got into the swing (although the ‘work’ is much more intense, as the
game seems to skip by) and was even able to steal 10 minutes with the doyen of
Caribbean broadcasters, Tony Cozier, receiving a comprehensive answer to the question I’d bundled into his day about why West
Indies had so many players of Indian descent. While people are too
busy to spend too much time away from their computers or microphones to
chit-chat, I was, by and large, welcomed. I was even asked to do a Two Chucks
20-second slot on cricinfo after a close-of-play ‘presser’.
Fortunately, Spin
also asked me to cover the (rain-ruined) Edgbaston Test, in which, you may
recall, former
Leek professional Tino Best broke the world record for highest Test score
by a number 11, coming within five runs of a hundred. It was here that my other
ice-breaker – a project about Minor Counties cricket’s acts of giantkilling – afforded
me the chance to chat with Geoffrey Boycott, twice part of a Yorkshire team
downed by amateurs: Durham (pre-first-class) and
Shropshire . He very generously gave me 25
minutes of his time and, listening respectfully to my questions, was far from
the strident, shouty curmudgeon he can occasionally seem on TMS. Nor did he make
any excuses about poor pitches or dodgy umpiring. “No, no. We were just
rubbish”.
Edgbaston press box |
Yet perhaps the highlight of it all came amidst the
long Edgbaston rain breaks. Having stockpiled my plate at the buffet, I found
an empty seat next to an unattended, equally full plate. A mouthful or two of pasta
later the inimitable figure of Sir Vivian Isaac Alexander Richards sidled up
and sat down beside me. Viv! 60 years old and still with the figure of a
middleweight boxer, he happily indulged my questions (I was being
self-consciously blasé and casual about shooting the breeze with arguably the
greatest batsman of the modern era). I got round to Tino, mentioned I’d faced
him, said he didn’t get me out. Viv didn’t look particularly impressed. I told
him I was a little afraid, mainly because Tino seemed capable at any moment of
bowling a beamer off 19 yards, and I asked whether he himself – despite the
gum-chewing gunslinger’s swagger, no helmet required – had ever been afraid. He
finished what he was chewing. “Man, you face individuals like Jeff Thomson,
Dennis Lillee, those guys, you going to be a bit afraid. But if you let them
see it, oh boy, you’re a dead man. You gotta walk out there proud, in a fashion
that says ‘I am Vivian Richards’, you know what I mean?”
I knew what he meant. I knew because I had played
over a hundred Tests before my thirteenth birthday and, more often than not,
had walked into bat saying to myself “I am Vivian Richards” (perhaps the reason why
my default release shot was to try, with scant success, whipping length balls
over mid-wicket).
Walk out there proud. Yeah.
This
was my second offering for ‘Barnfields Buzz’, my club’s newsletter. The first
is here.
Once again, the column appears to be twice as long as it should be. Next time,
I promise…
1 comment:
Nicely written article. I wouldn't be able to speak to Vivian Richards if I met him.
Post a Comment