Sammy: corridor of absurdity |
1. FIGHT…
It was the best of days, it was the worst of days for the
Windies and their band of post-(apo)Calypso triers. In the field, they showed guts
aplenty (not a pun on the plump and meaty Ravi-oli) as they whittled steadily
through the England innings, in the process bringing about what was either a statistical
curio (the verification of which would require skills I don’t have) or simply a
banal observation: the sequence of wickets was such that all five bowlers took
it in turns to snare their victims. Thus, Simpsons
character lookalike Rampaul added KP to his overnight scalps, before Roach
took out the middle-order B-unit. Sammy then nipped in with (a face-saving) two-fer:
a lazy drag-on from ‘Priory’ followed by a tired Strauss losing patience with a
negative line very wide of off stump, to a 7-2 field, and nicking off. Shillingford
then picked up Broad via a top-edged sweep. Finally, the man Boycott had wearily
dismissed on last night’s C5 highlights with “let’s be honest, Samuels can’t
bowl” (prompting a snort from Vaughan )
burgled the last two. Good stuff…
2. …OR FLIGHT
With a deficit of only 58 and 34 overs left in the day’s
play, Windies came out to bat after tea with a good opportunity to give England
an edgy night’s sleep. Once again, however, the innings lost its top quicker
than a sunbathing exhibitionist with a new boob job. And what a boob job it was: 61 for 6. Angry Anderson nipped out the
openers, Shiv had an ‘oh, sod it’ moment, before Bravo, Ramdin and a flu’d up vice-captain
Kirk were plumb to Bresnan, ruling out a final day’s cricket and some possible revenue
for Notts.
mediocrity |
3. NORFOLK THREE-FIELD SYSTEM
Back in the eighteenth century, food production (and world
history) was revolutionised by the farmers of East Anglia . They worked out that
selecting three fields to be cultivated cyclically – two fertile and abundant
with energy, a third fallow, recuperating its fecundity – would substantially
increase flows of nutrients and thus enable larger populations to be sustained.
In theory, the rotation of pace bowlers should work along similar lines, only Darren
Sammy, it seems, is permanently barren soil, leaving the other two, um, fields,
Roach and Rampaul, to produce the goods.
It may be an agricultural epicentre, but in cricketing terms
Norfolk is only a Minor County ,
of course – which is about the standard of Sammy’s bowling. The ancient
cat-skinners of Phoenicia might have eschewed a one-size-fits-all outlook, but there
is only a place for 75mph seamers in Test cricket if you’re not being milked at
4 runs per over. All this is a familiar enough, but the problem is simply not
going away. Windies need to address how they turn their skipper into a fifth
bowler (other than just bowling two feet wide of off stump) without
significantly weakening the batting. It is their cricket’s most significant
short-term issue.
roast carrots |
4. JOHNNY B, GOOD?
Around lunchtime, there was something of media spat between Spin’s former editor, George Dobell, and,
two floors up, Sky Sports’ resident county cricket expert Ian Botham, a
man known for opinions that are as forthright as they are often ill-informed. Remarking
upon Bairstow’s discomfort against some well-directed quick stuff from Kemar (‘Samosa’),
Botham suggested that “he won’t have faced too much 90mph bowling in County Cricket ”.
Dobell – who is rumoured to have seen a few days’ count cricket recently – refuted
this, which ruffled Sir Beefy’s feathers and he eventually challenged George,
on air rather than Twitter, to “name three”. The Twittersphere obliged with
double figures, by which time Sky seemed less keen to expose their semi-royalty’s
opinions as baseless. (And anyway, it was all somewhat moot, since Roach was
bowling between 84 and 87mph…according to Sky’s spped guns, at least.)
While the storm blew quickly enough across its teacup, the
fact remains that Bairstow batted extremely gingerly
against Roach. The first ball was an attempted bouncer that skidded flat,
crunching into his splice with him half-seeking evasive action. The next ball
was again short, but with much more intent, much more venom, and it would have
hit the Adam’s apple had he not got gloves in the way, the ball looping toward,
and short of, a scrambling gully.
Stiff-armed in India against spin on slow pitches
and now looking wooden and flat-footed against good quick bowling on a firm but
not lightening quick surface here, there must already be serious question marks
over the Yorkshireman in Test cricket. Another ginger, Eion Morgan, might not
be totally unhappy about that.
Bell |
5. TINKER-BELL
Ian Bell gives off the air of a man for whom it will be a
blessed relief when he reaches the end of his career and his statistical legacy
is finally known; intense, ticking, he’s a walking advertisement (and not a particularly
good one) for the interventions of sports psychology. Had he been around at the
time of the father of psychoanalysis, doubtless Freud would have prescribed him
cocaine, as he did all his patients (hence the talking cure), which would surely
have sent Bell ’s
already copious nervous energy spiralling.
Be that as it may, Bell
is a delightful batsman to watch and a substantial innings here would have
compensated the crowd for KP’s early exit. It was not to be. Short of another
record-breaking lower-order stand, such a knock will have to wait until the
next Test, at Edgbaston, his home ground, where rumour is afoot that Warwickshire
are soon to name the newly developed Pavilion End after him: “Chris Woakes will
be opening the bowling from the…”
6. BATTING DEEP
No comments:
Post a Comment