Rocking the Misbah at The Jazz Club
"LOOK..."
Ever since the twin influences of Sports Psychology and
media training – not to mention the psychology of media performances – reached
a tipping point at some point in the middle of the last decade, after which
time cricketers’ clumsy, clunky and pernicious butchering of the language has been
near-omnipresent (save an off-the-cuff Swann or two), it has been pretty much mandatory
for these automata cricketers to begin their largely banal answers to equally banal questions
with a subtly aggressive “Look …” I believe it originates from Ricky Ponting,
his way of conveying contempt for implicitly idiotic questions as well as
getting his questioner back on the right track. Now it appears that even the
cool-as Waqar Younis is doing it, judging by his interview on the Dubai square with
the ever-earnest Nasser about the precise way to go about bowling on roads (“When do you go full, though? I mean, you
can’t just float it up there and get driven.” “Look…”). So, look, I say it’s about time we all did
it. Look, it’s all about CONCEALING YOUR WEAKNESSES FROM THE OPPOSITION, WHO
WANT TO END YOUR CAREER AND EAT YOUR HEART ON TOAST. Look, BE FUCKING STRONG,
OK? Say “Look”. Look, now!
LOOK, ENGLAND COULDN'T
BAT THEIR EYELIDS
Poor batting generally results from cluttered minds and/or
poor concentration. England’s
first innings batting smacked of a machista
attempt to assert themselves against spin before they’d truly figured out which
were good options and which were not so good. The crucial thing is that, because the
ball wasn’t spitting at them and the wicket threat wasn’t high, they had time to get properly in before quietly
making these calls to themselves, putting ticks and crosses against the various
shots: sweep, cut, use feet, extra-cover drive. Strauss’s awful pull in the
first innings set the tone for the panicky sweeps that followed (tip: don’t
sweep on shiny, barely turning decks when guys are bowling wicket-to-wicket).
And KP’s moronic hook in the second innings confirmed the temporarily endemic
brainmelt. Wipe the humble pie from tha lips, boys, and get back to basics.
Postcards from the County Championship
LOOK, THE VENUE (AND
SCHEDULING) IS AN ELITIST FOLLY
Played out in a near-empty state-of-the-art 25,000-capacity
bowl, the Dubai match looked just like County Championship cricket played at
Test venues: 1000 or so lost diehards forming a fleshy tableau behind de rigueur St George’s flags onto which
were stitched the names of clubs from Slipless
in Settle. Aside from the amount of clothes they were wearing, the main
difference between this Test and, say, Yorkshire versus Glamorgan at Headingley was the cash flow of the punters: State pensions and homemade butties versus
income ‘disposable’ enough to allow one to gallivant to the cricket-playing
part of the planet’s must-visit destinations, including artificial and a-cultural communities grown in the
Petri dish of the desert (Australia, for instance) yet without the mitigating
allure of vice. Anyway, the sight of a stadium speckled with ICC nabobs and a
few not-so-Barmy Army – those in Dubai can perhaps be considered a sort of TA,
compared to the hardcore Marines that got pissed every day for a month Down Under – reminded
us of the pressures that Test cricket is facing (which, incidentally, is the
subject of an intriguing
new film project by Cricinfo’s camera-wielding pranksters, Jarrod and
Sampson [aka The Two Chucks]).
LOOK, BUMBLE IS THE MAN
When not doing chicken impressions, the Accrington
anecdotemonger was inspired by the ubiquitous livery of sponsors, Jazz (a
mobile phone company, apparently), to mimic the hushed, syrupy tones of The Fast Show’s John Thompson’s Jazz Club.
Broadcasting highlight of the year so far, although the competition hasn’t been
very strong…
"Sorry, what did you say your name was?"
LOOK, AAMIR SOHAIL IS
PRICK(LY)
Mr Sohail brought a very aggressive and chippy new presence
to the box, I feel. On Day 1, I had the distinct impression that Mike Atherton
– not someone you would imagine shirking a rumble – had to bite his tongue (I
cannot recall over what) in order to sidestep an on-air brouhaha, which he did
dextrously and professionally. Then, on Day 3, when Bumble mildly criticized
Adnan Akmal for bringing a hint of village cricket to the international arena
by trying the old 20-yard stumping, underarming the ball at the stumps every so
often (which clearly annoyed Trott and Prior and caused embarrassed laughter
among the elder statesmen of his team), Sohail rasped: “Yaa, but Matt Prior
would do same”. Alright, kid; settle
down! Bumble went silent for well over a minute. Friction in the box,
methinks (not that sort!). On which note, I wonder how
Sohail’s getting on with his former opening partner, the altogether more placid
and charming Rameez Raja… Anyway, I’ll be keeping an eye on this: paranoid and
defensive in the extreme. (Incidentally, A Sohail is not a million miles from
“asshole”, and probably quite easy to mispronounce as such.)
[Look, this “Look”
shit has got to stop immediately – Ed.]
Willis
"WHAT CHU TALKIN' 'BOUT, WILLIS?"
Sat in the charisma-free zone of the Sky Studio with Gower, Professor
Yaffle was at his curmudgeonly, droning, joyless worst, a veritable creaking door
hinge of a man. Although I tend to switch off – metaphorically, I mean – when
he speaks, this time I listened as he tossed out the accusation that Saeed
Ajmal only wore long-sleeved shirts to hide a bent elbow. Tiresome. I’m not
entirely sure whether Atherton’s post-match interview with Man of the Match
Ajmal – who’d come into the game trumpeting a new delivery, the teesra – contained a Freudian slip when
he asked “have you got anything else up your sleeve?” but anyway, with Sky Sports happy
to have their viewers subject to Willisian misery as a counterbalance to
Bumble’s joie de vivre, evidently (especially in the post-T20 world of Dilscoops and
switch hits) it truly does take Different Strokes.
TRESCOBABBLE
Stick to being head-and-shoulders above your contemporaries
at cuffing half-decent county seamers about the place, Marcus, because your
punditry is woeful: lacking insight, falling back on dog-eared half-truths
(“it’s about the mental battle now,” apparently; wasn’t it ever thus for Banger...), and occasionally bordering on
actual nonsense. There’s a certain category of pundit – ex-players, I mean (not
that Tres is retired) – who presumably struggle to articulate their ideas because throughout their active life in the dressing room they would unfailingly litter their language
with profanities. No observation would be proffered without a “fucking” as modifier
or intensifier. Of course, given things like broadcasting standards, watersheds and
whatnot, the new environment thus tends to bring about a certain awkward self-consciousness in our pundit (think
Tommo
on Sky Soccer Saturday), leaving him
inhibited and tongue-tied, shorn of his stock diction. Now, I’m not 100% sure this is the case with Tresco, but listening
to his contorted attempts to bring some expertise to bear on proceedings, I’m
starting to see why Somerset
have fallen short so often recently. Waffle.
Bad Mo Fo
TEST MATCH SOFA
I haven’t tuned in to The Sofa so far, mainly because I cannot synch commentary to images, but I’d be
colossally disappointed if they didn’t have, as the jingle for Pakistani
skipper Misbah-ul-Haq, The Clash’s ‘Rocking the Casbah’: Shareef don't like it... I
would also hope they have a slice of Tchaikovsky for the luxuriantly coiffeused
Mohammad Hafeez – funnily enough, a cricketer whose name is exactly what a
Turkish guy in an Istanbul nightclub once said to me when I was on the lookout
for disco biscuits – on account of his balletic variation on the Saqlain
template: a dinky shuffle or glide to the wicket then, in the gather, arms above head in the “fifth position”. I expect to see him in a leotard for the
next game.
TREMLETT'S HEIGHT
DISADVANTAGE
Ask any of what Jamie Redknapp might call the game’s “top, top” top-order batters what they least like to face, chances are
they’ll say “bounce” rather than pace. (Before you write in and complain, or
send me death threats for being “totelee fukin rong”, there’s a good chance the
top top top-order batter might use a synonym: trajectory, say, or height –
use your fucking imagination.) Bowlers who crash the ball into the splice from
pretty much a good length are to be feared for precisely the same reason as an
old sash window is: it’s easy to get your digits trapped by them. Which hurts. On
the benign surface of Dubai,
however, the bounce has hardly been steepling, even though, when the ball was
hard, it still cleared the bails from a good length for the likes of Tremlett.
Consequently, with lbw and bowled being the most likely mode of dismissal,
Tremors [which must be the correct
orthography, fellow writers and bloggers, not 'Tremmers'] has had to pitch the ball further
up, duly bringing it into the batter’s driving zone, the overall result of
which being that he went wicketless for the first completed innings of his
career. So, 1-0 down with two to play: do we need a change? ...Well, it’s certainly a shame that Bresnan has had elbow problems (not
connected to chucking, said the unsuspicious Willis of the salt-of-the-earth
Englishman) as he’d be very useful out here, bowling straight and reversing it,
not to mention chipping in with runs. As it is, the media will speculate about
the rapidly improving and decidedly brisk Steve Finn being chucked in, maybe
even Monty, but in the end Flower and Strauss will stick with the same side. Fickle, they are not.
|
Shaven ravers... |
BEARDLESS WONDERS
I note that none of the current Pakistan side are sporting beards:
a veritable Beard Free Zone. Does this mean a lessening of the religious zeal
that embraced the team at various points under various recent leaderships, with group
prayers and suchlike? At the risk of bringing a fatwa upon myself for venturing a hypothesis of such infinitesimal insignificance it might as well be suppressed, there might be an inverse correlation
between the degree and intensity of a team’s piety and their capacity to muck in together
and accept responsibility: i.e. the more devout, the more submissive, the less
likely to be properly accountable, the more likely to look to blame others and fall apart. To
be clear, I would contend that this is true of any faith. The fact is that the
secular ethos, which holds that we are the architects of our own destiny in the
universe, that we must build our own histories, our own institutions, often
means taking active responsibility, which tends to help in cricket, with its individual-battles-within-team-context format… Anyway, I’m no pogonophobe, but
is there not something in this beardlessness and their improved performance? At the
very least, all that hair around the chin in a hot climate cannot help people find
a space of comfort in which to perform...
And that’s it. Bring on Abu Dhabi and the excruciating Fred Flintstone
gags…